Latest

GRAS in The Green Register 20.03.2025
Preston Tower: material and tectonics ESALA lecture by Charlie Porter 13.03.2025
Kinloch Lodge shortlisted for the 2025 RIAS Awards 28.02.2025
Project milestone: Tolbooth in West Wemyss 20.02.2025
Darney Quarry 06.02.2025
GRAS with Paper Foundation 30.01.2025
Gunnar Groves-Raines featured in the Design Leadership Network’s Journal 23.01.2025
2024 Study trip: The Weston at Yorkshire Sculpture Park 06.01.2025
On Site: St Mary’s Chapel at Kirk of St Nicholas 23.12.2024
2024 Study Trip: John Rylands Research Institute and Library, Manchester 17.12.2024
View all entries
Preston Tower, Doocot and Garden
GRAS_1800_Preston Tower_1

The site consists of a late 15th century ruinous Tower House and a 17th century Doocot within a walled garden in Prestonpans. It is owned by the National Trust for Scotland but has been managed by East Lothian Council since 1972.  Situated in a coastal area of a former mining town, the area has faced deprivation and a lack of investment over the years.

The project is publicly funded and the brief was developed in collaboration between the building owners, the management organisation and the community. The priority was to bring the structures into a good state of repair, improve public access to both buildings, and provide interpretation of the site in order to enhance the experience for current users, increase awareness of its significance and encourage more people to visit.

A light touch approach was important in order to maintain the character of the site and the proposals were distilled to concise architectural moves in order to make sense of the existing gardens and open up and improve the flow of the visitor experience, whilst protecting the future of the built fabric and landscape. Budget constraints and a conservation approach necessitated a very careful prioritising of works, including minimising maintenance.

The first phase of works comprised repairs to the Doocot and boundary walls and new accessible paths, landscaping, and interpretation. The first phase gave time for the upskilling of the contractor, a detailed understanding of the Tower to be formed and a relationship with the community to be developed.

The second phase comprised various methods of consolidation to the Tower, interpretation works and the installation of a new external stair to provide access to the first-floor interior. Detailed survey work including investigative archaeological surveys and specialist photogrammetry have supported increased understanding and interpretation of the site and informed both technical repair responses and new architectural interventions.

The repair work itself has become part of the archaeological interpretation of the site. New sensitively designed galvanised metalwork has been installed to the external openings, treated to provide a subtle lead coloured finish. The tower has been made watertight with a new mastic asphalt finish on the second floor which forms the roof to the main hall.

From examining the stonework, archaeologists identified where wooden beams were, and where later changes had been made to the original structure. A new modern staircase, which echoes some of the possible historic stairs, has been added to allow access to the historic main entrance. It uses materials to reflect what has been used on the tower including a stone platt with treated galvanised metal structure.

Local involvement was maintained throughout the design process, and a breadth of activities was carried out in order to capture as broad an input as possible.  The collective ambition was that the community would take symbolic ownership of the site, run tours and manage the visitor experience. A Friends Group has now been formed in order to take on this task, with ongoing support from all stakeholders.

This project is one chapter in the site’s history where a stabilised, revived and improved beloved heritage asset has been delivered back to its community, ready to be utilised to positively contribute to the common weal of the entire area.  Rather than a comprehensive refurbishment, it is a collection of small precise interventions which together make a large impact.

Location

Prestonpans, Scotland

Client

East Lothian Council, National Trust for Scotland

Completed

2024

Type

Cultural

Awards

2024 EAA Conservation & Heritage Award Winner
2024 EAA Building of the Year Winner
2024 198th Royal Scottish Academy Architecture Prize

GRAS Team

Charlie Porter
John Robson
Natasha Huq
Stewart Stirling

Contractor

Campbell and Smith Construction Group Ltd

Structural Engineers

Narro Associates

Stone Conservation

Graciela Ainsworth Sculpture Conservation

Metalworks

Andrew Turner Blacksmiths

Interpretation

Lyndsey Clark + Artibrand
Studio Winton
AOC Archaeology
Bob Marshall

Archaeology

CFA Archaeology Ltd

M&E Engineers

Max Fordham

Quantity Surveyors

Morham & Brotchie Partnership

Other Consultants

TD Tree & Land Services
NBC Environment
Adams Napier Partnership

Photography

Murray Orr
Shaun Barton
Paula Szturc

Funding

Scottish Government: Town Centre Regeneration Fund
National Lottery: Heritage Fund

Preston Tower, Doocot and Garden

Preston Tower, Doocot and Garden Details

GRAS_1800_Preston Tower_5

It is a truly remarkable achievement to have delivered a stabilised, revived and improved beloved heritage asset back to its community, ready to be utilised to positively contribute to the common good of the entire area.

DJ Johnston-Smith, Prestonpans Community Council Chair

GRAS_1800_Reference

David MacGibbon and Thomas Ross, The Castellated and Domestic Architecture of Scotland from the Twelfth to the Eighteenth Century, Vol. 1 (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1887), 318.

GRAS_1800_Preston Tower_7

A light touch approach was important in order to maintain the character of the site and the proposals were distilled to concise architectural moves in order to make sense of the existing gardens and open up and improve the flow of the visitor experience, whilst protecting the future of the built fabric and landscape. Budget constraints and a conservation approach necessitated a very careful prioritising of works, including minimising maintenance.

Pinning Sketch
GRAS_1800_Preston Tower_8
GRAS_1800_Preston Tower_3

From examining the stonework, archaeologists identified where wooden beams were, and where later changes had been made to the original structure. A new modern staircase, which echoes some of the possible historic stairs, has been added to allow access to the historic main entrance. It uses materials to reflect what has been used on the tower including a stone platt with treated galvanised metal structure.

GRAS_1800_Preston Tower_10
GRAS_1800_Preston Tower_12
GRAS_1800_Preston Tower_4
GRAS_1800_Preston Tower_6

Material Focus

The combination of local stonemasons and specialist stone conservators provided the range of skills required for all the different aspects of the stonework, which required precise detailing and specification. Traditional construction techniques were used and as much of the existing stonework as possible was kept. Appropriate new stone, sourced locally, was chosen for each part of the tower, fitting with the overall aesthetic. These were decorated and carved where necessary to match but are intended to be clearly seen as a new repair.

  1. An array of pinning stones
  2. Local sandstone
  3. Hot-mixed lime mortar
  4. T-wash treated galvanised metal

Rather than a comprehensive refurbishment, this project is a collection of small precise surgical interventions which together make a large impact.

Natasha Huq, Conservation Architect